Architecture verdict
Direct, single-agent, deterministic, hybrid, or adaptive specification—with a reason and boundary.
// Free · no signup · about 60 seconds
Find what breaks first—before you automate it.
Describe one repetitive task. Get the safest way to automate it, the first risk to fix, and a small pilot you can try.
- 0 workflow data sent
- 5 architecture paths
- 8 supporting diagnostics
// One input → one decision packet
Failure map
The first likely break, its early signal, and the smallest containment control.
Pilot contract
A bounded first release, explicit permissions, failure states, and tests that reject unsupported completion.
// Four quick answers
Tell us about one task.
Rough answers are enough. You can improve the estimate later.
Full blueprint Show the implementation details Capacity estimate, controls, tests, and all eight diagnostics
// Need implementation judgment?
Have Mario review the blueprint against the real workflow.
The free packet stays yours. A conversation is only useful when you want to validate assumptions, integrations, controls, or the pilot.
// Honest boundaries
What this does—and does not do.
Is this an AI chatbot?
No. The flagship is a deterministic decision engine. The same inputs produce the same blueprint, and the reasoning signals are visible.
Does the score prove automation will work?
No. It is a planning heuristic. The packet tells you what to test with real cases before treating any value or reliability estimate as evidence.
Where do the eight tools fit?
They are focused diagnostics. The blueprint ranks the three most relevant to your case, while keeping all eight available for deeper testing.