The free What Breaks First? blueprint turns one real process into an architecture verdict, first-failure prediction, control plan, smallest pilot, and acceptance tests. It runs locally in your browser. Then use the eight engineering tools below as focused diagnostics when the blueprint tells you what needs deeper testing.
// No signup · deterministic first · evidence before completionDescribe one workflow. Leave with a build-ready blueprint: the right architecture, the first likely failure, permission boundaries, a transparent capacity scenario, the smallest reversible pilot, and tests that must pass.
Architecture verdictFirst-break mapPilot + testsUse these when the flagship recommends them. They are diagnostic instruments, not the starting point.
Submit any LLM claim. Three free models (Nemotron + Gemma + MiniMax) fact-check it in parallel. See agreement matrix + ROC-style consensus verdict + per-model citations of specific factual errors.
Paste an AI workflow. Returns pole-zero analysis: where it will run away, where it will deadlock, gain margins, PID-style fixes (P=immediate, I=accumulate, D=predict). Control theory applied to AI orchestration.
Describe your AI workflow in English. Get back an OSI-style architecture: agent tiers, routing, QoS budget classes, TTL spawn-depth limits, congestion control, risks. Plus a Graphviz DOT diagram you can render.
Describe an AI use case. Returns IEC 61508 / ISO 26262 style fault-tree analysis, FMEA table, SIL/ASIL recommendation, required safeguards, and a deploy / deploy-with-guards / do-not-deploy verdict.
Paste a prompt. Get sentence-by-sentence SNR scoring (signal vs noise vs redundant), Shannon channel-capacity estimate, wasted-tokens %, top 3 cuts, recommended compression. DSP applied to text.
Submit any answer. Three models adversarially try to break it — find flaws, unsupported claims, factual errors, logical issues. Returns per-model critique + agreement matrix + consensus verdict.
Compare two prompts as vectors in embedding space. Returns cosine similarity, semantic-shift analysis, shared concepts, what's unique to each, intent match, likelihood of producing the same response.
Set deadline (ms) and max tokens. Watch the fallback chain execute live: which model handled it, how close to your deadline, watchdog status. Embedded-systems thinking applied to LLM ops.
Every tool run is logged to a public audit feed (IPs anonymized). You can see:
A normal "free AI tool" is one box → one answer, with everything that matters hidden. These tools expose the engineering: which model handled your request (because the primary often hits free-tier rate limits), how the fallback chain reacted, latency for each call, SNR scores where applicable, agreement between independent models. This is what production AI looks like — and the same architecture I deploy for paying clients running real workloads. Each tool has a "Want this scaled?" link to the matching paid service in my catalog.