Skip to content
sinc-LLMBook a 30-minute call

Audit · Keep control

LLM Security Red-Team

Find the weaknesses ordinary AI testing can miss.

Test your LLM application against agreed adversarial scenarios. Receive a threat model, evidence for the tested attacks and a prioritized list of controls to address.

$42,500USD · project price

Published timing: threat model + control list in 10 to 14 days
Final scope and timing are confirmed before work begins.

Illustrative workflow
  1. LLM application
  2. Adversarial tests
  3. Evidence + controls

The shape of the scoped work, not a client result or a finished-product screenshot.

The work today

A starting point you can recognize.

An LLM application, access and a defined testing scope.

Ordinary usage tests do not exercise adversarial behavior.

The progress to work toward

Understand exploitable weaknesses and which controls to address.

A scoped adversarial campaign, threat model, attack evidence and prioritized controls.

The engagement is scoped around your inputs and acceptance criteria. The outcome is a goal, not a guarantee.

A concrete engagement

What you receive. What you bring.

Included in the scope

  • A scoped adversarial campaign, threat model, attack evidence and prioritized controls.
Read the original advertised scope

Run an adversarial test campaign against your LLM application covering OWASP LLM Top 10 attack classes and relevant MITRE ATLAS techniques, then deliver a written threat model, a per-attack evidence record, and a prioritized control list.

Inputs for the conversation

LLM application access + scope documentation

Discuss access requirements first. Do not send passwords or private customer data in a public enquiry.

Agree how to judge it

A redacted attack record showing the attempt, observed behavior and recommended control.

An example to agree during scoping, not a claim that this evidence has already been produced for your project.

A useful fit

Consider this when…

You have an application and a real decision about its security controls.

A different starting point

Choose another path when…

You need a blanket security certification or expect every weakness to be eliminated by the assessment.

An existing native feature or a smaller change may be sufficient. The call should establish that before a build is proposed.

Evidence, with its limits

Know what you can inspect.

The process diagram explains the mechanism. It is illustrative, and it does not establish results for your workload.

  • Published scope ↗

    The published offer establishes the advertised scope. It does not establish results for your workload.

Ask to review a relevant example and agree the evidence your engagement will produce before committing.

Before you commit

A clear scope comes first.

Price basis. $42,500 USD · published project price. Scope, timing and fees are confirmed in the proposal.

Operating costs. Model usage, hosting and any agreed ongoing support are separate where applicable.

Payment schedule. Confirm the payment and billing-start terms for this engagement in the proposal.

Support and cancellation. Confirm support coverage, cancellation and rescheduling terms before committing. A refund policy is not specified here.

Read the existing service terms ↗

Your next step

Bring the work to the conversation.

Review your selected engagement, then choose a discovery-call time. Scope, fees and dependencies are agreed before work begins.

Review & discuss this scope

No payment is taken on this page.

A closer look

Which scope fits your work?

Prices describe different engagements. Final scope, timing and fees are confirmed in the proposal.