Skip to content
sinc-LLMBook a 30-minute call

Build · Keep control

Agent Audit Trail

Trace an agent instruction through to its reviewed result.

Set up a session record that connects assigned instructions to the responsible agent, resulting artifacts, review verdicts and open human decisions. Check traceability coverage when the session closes.

$12,500USD · project price

Published timing: 4 to 6 days
Final scope and timing are confirmed before work begins.

Illustrative workflow
  1. Instruction
  2. Artifact + review
  3. Session record

The shape of the scoped work, not a client result or a finished-product screenshot.

The work today

A starting point you can recognize.

Agent sessions, instructions and output artifacts.

Logs are scattered and do not connect assignments to accepted outcomes.

The progress to work toward

Explain which instruction led to which result and review decision.

A per-session directory linking instructions, agents, artifacts, QA verdicts and human decisions.

The engagement is scoped around your inputs and acceptance criteria. The outcome is a goal, not a guarantee.

A concrete engagement

What you receive. What you bring.

Included in the scope

  • A per-session directory linking instructions, agents, artifacts, QA verdicts and human decisions.
Read the original advertised scope

Set up a per-session run directory that links every assigned instruction to the agent that handled it, the artifact it produced, the QA verdict on that artifact, and the human decision that resolved any open issue, then verify traceability coverage at session close.

Inputs for the conversation

current agent setup + sample session logs

Discuss access requirements first. Do not send passwords or private customer data in a public enquiry.

Agree how to judge it

A sample session traced from one instruction to its artifact and final decision.

An example to agree during scoping, not a claim that this evidence has already been produced for your project.

A useful fit

Consider this when…

You need to reconstruct and review what an agent run actually did.

A different starting point

Choose another path when…

You need a pre-action control; recording a run does not itself stop an action.

An existing native feature or a smaller change may be sufficient. The call should establish that before a build is proposed.

Evidence, with its limits

Know what you can inspect.

The process diagram explains the mechanism. It is illustrative, and it does not establish results for your workload.

  • Published scope ↗

    The published offer establishes the advertised scope. It does not establish results for your workload.

Ask to review a relevant example and agree the evidence your engagement will produce before committing.

Before you commit

A clear scope comes first.

Price basis. $12,500 USD · published project price. Scope, timing and fees are confirmed in the proposal.

Operating costs. Model usage, hosting and any agreed ongoing support are separate where applicable.

Build payments. The services page advertises 50% at kickoff and 50% at delivery for builds. Confirm the applicable payment schedule in your proposal.

Support and cancellation. Confirm support coverage, cancellation and rescheduling terms before committing. A refund policy is not specified here.

Read the existing service terms ↗

Your next step

Bring the work to the conversation.

Review your selected engagement, then choose a discovery-call time. Scope, fees and dependencies are agreed before work begins.

Review & discuss this scope

No payment is taken on this page.

A closer look

Which scope fits your work?

Prices describe different engagements. Final scope, timing and fees are confirmed in the proposal.