Skip to content
sinc-LLMBook a 30-minute call

Build · Content & outreach

Persuasion Audit

Give each draft a consistent persuasion and trust review.

Install a local tool that checks drafts against ten persuasion and trust rules and explains specific issues and suggested edits. The checks run without model API calls or network egress.

$3,750USD · project price

Published timing: installed MCP tool in 2 to 3 days
Final scope and timing are confirmed before work begins.

Illustrative workflow
  1. Your draft
  2. 10 review rules
  3. Verdict + edits

The shape of the scoped work, not a client result or a finished-product screenshot.

The work today

A starting point you can recognize.

Draft copy and a compatible Claude MCP environment.

Feedback is subjective and the same issues recur across drafts.

The progress to work toward

Review copy consistently for persuasion and trust issues.

An installed local MCP checker with ten rules, specific verdicts and edit suggestions.

The engagement is scoped around your inputs and acceptance criteria. The outcome is a goal, not a guarantee.

A concrete engagement

What you receive. What you bring.

Included in the scope

  • An installed local MCP checker with ten rules, specific verdicts and edit suggestions.
Read the original advertised scope

Install a local MCP tool that checks any draft copy against 10 peer-reviewed persuasion and trust rules, returns a structured verdict with specific violation reasons and edit suggestions, and operates without network egress or model API calls.

Inputs for the conversation

your Claude MCP environment

Discuss access requirements first. Do not send passwords or private customer data in a public enquiry.

Agree how to judge it

A real draft, its flagged passages and the resulting edit suggestions.

An example to agree during scoping, not a claim that this evidence has already been produced for your project.

A useful fit

Consider this when…

You need repeatable feedback on multiple drafts.

A different starting point

Choose another path when…

You need a one-off human rewrite, a traffic strategy or proof of conversion uplift.

An existing native feature or a smaller change may be sufficient. The call should establish that before a build is proposed.

Evidence, with its limits

Know what you can inspect.

The process diagram explains the mechanism. It is illustrative, and it does not establish results for your workload.

  • Published scope ↗

    The published offer establishes the advertised scope. It does not establish results for your workload.

Ask to review a relevant example and agree the evidence your engagement will produce before committing.

Before you commit

A clear scope comes first.

Price basis. $3,750 USD · published project price. Scope, timing and fees are confirmed in the proposal.

Operating costs. Model usage, hosting and any agreed ongoing support are separate where applicable.

Build payments. The services page advertises 50% at kickoff and 50% at delivery for builds. Confirm the applicable payment schedule in your proposal.

Support and cancellation. Confirm support coverage, cancellation and rescheduling terms before committing. A refund policy is not specified here.

Read the existing service terms ↗

Your next step

Bring the work to the conversation.

Review your selected engagement, then choose a discovery-call time. Scope, fees and dependencies are agreed before work begins.

Review & discuss this scope

No payment is taken on this page.

A closer look

Which scope fits your work?

Prices describe different engagements. Final scope, timing and fees are confirmed in the proposal.