Skip to content
sinc-LLMBook a 30-minute call

Audit · Decide what’s next

AI Architecture Review

Know what to fix before you fund the next AI build.

Review the AI stack you already run and receive a written account of failure modes, unnecessary complexity and cost concerns, with a prioritized fix list. The review informs implementation decisions.

$10,000USD · project price

Published timing: 5 to 7 days
Final scope and timing are confirmed before work begins.

Illustrative workflow
  1. Existing stack
  2. Failure-mode review
  3. Prioritized report

The shape of the scoped work, not a client result or a finished-product screenshot.

The work today

A starting point you can recognize.

A running AI stack, code and architecture notes.

The team cannot see the main failure modes, duplication and cost tradeoffs together.

The progress to work toward

Know which fixes or investments deserve attention next.

A fixed-scope review and written report with a prioritized fix list.

The engagement is scoped around your inputs and acceptance criteria. The outcome is a goal, not a guarantee.

A concrete engagement

What you receive. What you bring.

Included in the scope

  • A fixed-scope review and written report with a prioritized fix list.
Read the original advertised scope

You have AI in production but no map of where it is fragile, redundant, or costing more than it should. A fixed-scope paid audit: I read your stack, locate the failure modes, and deliver a written report with a prioritized fix list.

Inputs for the conversation

codebase access + architecture notes

Discuss access requirements first. Do not send passwords or private customer data in a public enquiry.

Agree how to judge it

A representative report showing evidence, priorities and why each recommendation matters.

An example to agree during scoping, not a claim that this evidence has already been produced for your project.

A useful fit

Consider this when…

You need a decision about the existing system before commissioning changes.

A different starting point

Choose another path when…

You already know the exact fault and only need its implementation fixed.

An existing native feature or a smaller change may be sufficient. The call should establish that before a build is proposed.

Evidence, with its limits

Know what you can inspect.

The process diagram explains the mechanism. It is illustrative, and it does not establish results for your workload.

  • Published scope ↗

    The published offer establishes the advertised scope. It does not establish results for your workload.

Ask to review a relevant example and agree the evidence your engagement will produce before committing.

Before you commit

A clear scope comes first.

Price basis. $10,000 USD · published project price. Scope, timing and fees are confirmed in the proposal.

Operating costs. Model usage, hosting and any agreed ongoing support are separate where applicable.

Payment schedule. Confirm the payment and billing-start terms for this engagement in the proposal.

Support and cancellation. Confirm support coverage, cancellation and rescheduling terms before committing. A refund policy is not specified here.

Read the existing service terms ↗

Your next step

Bring the work to the conversation.

Review your selected engagement, then choose a discovery-call time. Scope, fees and dependencies are agreed before work begins.

Review & discuss this scope

No payment is taken on this page.

A closer look

Which scope fits your work?

Prices describe different engagements. Final scope, timing and fees are confirmed in the proposal.